domenica 14 aprile 2019

13 marzo 2019 united nations human rights council complaint procedure

i sent other complaint requests  litte i have hot

i sent in other 3 times at least

this complaint sayd this as a summary of things



·  ·  ·  ·  continuing violations
Yahoo/Inviati
  •  
xxxx <xxxx@yahoo.it>
A:CP@ohchr.org
17 mar alle ore 00:50
i send this email to complaint continuity in violations on me.
starting with lawsuit of 24 october 2013 that had no result violations continue.i speak about that problem but many other problems i listed.

maybe depending  on violations on me in that moment law has vanished for me.
i cann't to think live without law. after i live without other things.
of mere things have came at a serious point today when supreme court has rejected my appeal. that case was a
tipical case of multiple violations in my opinion from that everything has started.
it seems law search ways to strip law. and this is very last thing to use to strip the rights.
i have listed 14 cases of violations. at least tree are non listed. and many many other violations on a daily basis are going.
and i write a this body from much time. things have non changed have get worse in time. the most success would to be strip law. in days when the things are always more clear.





Human Rights Council
Complaint Procedure Form



                      You are kindly requested to submit your complaint in writing in one of the six official UN languages (Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian and Spanish) and to use these languages in any future correspondence;
-                     Anonymous complaints are not admissible;       
-                     It is recommended that your complaint does not exceed eight pages, excluding enclosures.                              
-                     You are kindly requested not to use abusive or insulting language.

I. Information concerning the author (s) of the communication or the alleged victim (s) if other than the author



Individual                   Group of individuals                 NGO                  Other
Last name: xxxx………
First name(s): xxxx………….
Nationality: …italiana…… 
Address for correspondence on this complaint: via  xxxxxx  italy………..
Tel and fax: (please indicate country and area code) xxxxx……….
E-mail: xxxxx@yahoo.it……….

facebook site  



with over  
Submitting the complaint:
On the author’s own behalf: 
On behalf of other persons:  (Please specify: ………………..)

II. Information on the State concerned
Name of the State concerned and, as applicable, name of public authorities responsible for the alleged violation(s): Italia,  …………..

III. Facts of the complaint and nature of the alleged violation(s)
The complaint procedure addresses consistent patterns of gross and reliably attested violations of all human rights and all fundamental freedoms occurring in any part of the world and under any circumstances.
Please detail, in chronological order, the facts and circumstances of the alleged violations including dates, places and alleged perpetrators and how you consider that the facts and circumstances described violate your rights or that of the concerned person(s).   

I have presented at least 10 lawsuits to prosecutor. I list them next and discuss them in brief after the list. All lawsuits have problems. I discuss in detail the lawsuit of 24 october 2013 one of most importance and without result. And that I think has caused all the problems.                    …

List of lawsuits presented

in chronologically order i prersent all the lawsuits i have presented in the time. they are detailed well in my site. the summary is
1  a lawsuit against me in june 2012 made for embezzlement  duration 24 months and 2 search at home.  now closed. 
2  lawsuit for alleged stalking made on 24/10//2013 number  8884/2013 and 11/28/2013 integration I submitted:
3  on 11/28/2013 number 9822/2013  complaint for bad service of a pharmacy. currently open proceedings but to no results.
4  always on 11/28/2013 number 838/2013 for bad behaviors during a request for autopsy. an important witness was not heard and lawsuit was closed.
5  on 7/16/2015 complaint for misappropriation of a sum. the terms had expired but the fact could with aggravation . closed.  lawsuit can continue on request of damages.
6  on 26/9/2016  number  15464/15 for other alleged stalking at home. open but on stand by for now.  It has been told i is closed now. Not have document from court yet.
7  on 12/10/2015 number  21099/15 more and different type of stalking on roads. open this but on stand by
8  complaint for fraud by a mechanic on May 8, 2016.  it was requested to closed. I did opposition an then opposition at supreme court.  Supreme court reject my legal demand in  march 2018.

9  lawsuit  6/7/2017  protocollo verbale:  RNCS12 2017 VD 902136 stalking on the roads.  Presented at Carabinieri of my city.  Other that of 12/10/2015  for more hard stalking.  Actually open.
10  lawsuit  18/10/2017  to reopen investigations on the old lawsuit  of october 2013 n. 8884.  closed.  
11  lawsuit for alleged stalking in date 27/12/2017 . from a neighbour.   judge has asked to close this lawsuit.
My effords to present another opposition with other arguments and materials was delayed by lawyer of the time.  I have listed my communications with this lawyer. Lawsuit is so closed officially.
12   one minor signalation in November 2017 to police for strange behaviours near city park. To me it seemed another stalking done by several people.

13 in 17 september 2018 I presented lawsuit a prosecutor to consider if in behaviour of my lawyer and of Judge GIP there have been something relevant for justice. And asked to reopen investigation on that judiciary case.  And add other details in form of records and transcitions.

14   In 7 march 2019 I present another reporting /compliant to police of my city for bad behaviour of one person on the roads. It was almost an aggression and with a damage to my car in my opionion.
To present this compliant I have had many problems as I list in my site.
Today I have many problems to do everything.
In the site are listing only a little part of all the problems.

It seems to me justice refuse to take in consideration the facts I present. And continuely close lawsuits.
I have experienced many other strange facts and only in last few months. It is possible to see in my site
…..…………………………………………………………………………………………...
…………………………………………………………………………………………………..

MORE DETAILS ABOUT LAWSUITS_______________________________



1) a lawsuit against me in june 2012 made from director of my office at job for printing 20-30 pages,  has resulted in charges of embezzlement and a 24 month long investigation is now complete with archiviation. With two house searches by police. It started with an home investigation in june 2012   https://aaastrangedevelopments.blogspot.com/2013/04/athe-next-images-are-comunications-to-me.html





2)  my lawsuit for stalking at home was made on 10/24/2013,
 it was request to be dismissed in June 2014. the opposition, which was presented in a right times  has not brought to some result  for 2 and a half years. only for my insistence was fixed by judge an hearing in chambers on 2/12/2016 that ended with the judge (GIP)  that send the case to judge of peace on small charges of disturbance of rest of the people.



_____________________________



6) over this case of  justice i have presented another lawsuit foc a case very similar (stalking at home) e presented in date on 26/sett/2015  number 15464/15 . Accompanied by sound files to confirm everything. Still open but without results. files audio last for over 1 year. i have also video about it.

7) I again presented a lawsuit for stalking on the roads on 12/10/2015  number  21099/15. in this i signal the incorrect behavior of different subjects on the streets. A summary of things that happen lately are viewable on the site
https://twitter.com/verde_verxxxx  where the videos are taken with the program for streaming periscope. and  here too
In addition to these videos i have presented in the lawsuit more videos,  from March 2014 they are now on youtube in private mode.
Other later youtube site with videos,  with hundreds videos
Here other youtube site 

Today I have add video from my facebook account.  At  this address

obvously bad behavior is continuing and worsens.  And is becoming very serious.


Ref  for lawsuit about stalking on the roa    https://aaastrangedevelopments.blogspot.com/2016/08/cronologia-degli-atti.html 



over than on the streets i have encounter strange behavior in many other social situations. Some of these are documented in the site.
This lawsuit seems revealing of misconduct towards me on several fronts so much that i have rised a considerable anxiety in me. Of more the delay with which these problems are treated by Justice push me to use this resource to try to find a solution.

Just i list some elusive behavior of various tecnicians I consulted in time and I kept documentation.
For example some tecnician i consulted to do improvements at home. Starting from 2010

 I almost got nothing and several technicians i have consulted. A mechanic that I sued for fraud. A pc owner.  present also a list of past problems and misconducts.  And also of course the elusive behavior of justice professionals.  Some details you can see here
and others in the site.

9)  6 luglio 2017 presented other lawsuit at local Carabinieri station for other type of stalking on the roads. protocollo verbale:  RNCS12 2017 VD 902136. 

 in the lawsuit i presented documentation video that lasts 2 and half months. from around 15 april 2017 to 30 june 2017. i signal that i fear for my safety. last videos are in youtube sites too. 

also   another youtube channel
 And in that last twitter site

____   like a confirm in 31 july 2017 i clash with another car along the street. clash with another auto in back move. this car move back from other park on other side of street and hit me meanwhile i go on other side of street. i have a chart that confirm it written for insurance purpose.


to me seems very too much. so present this demand to this body of UN

I have these and others compliants. I don’t report all these. They are possible to read on the site

and bad works in many sectors.

_____   with car very many problems. and bad work. to replace the clutch of car i waited 1 (one) month. and work was very bad. i have testify of other tecnician. bad work that is not possible to do. compliant  to carabinieri  8/5/2016




and then an incredible waste of time. List in site is much incomplete. for every little thing. post service does not bring mail to my home when it had alwasys done that in past. . the motive was because on my postbox there is not my name and is told on site of mail service that if there is not the name the postman is autorized to send back the mail.
then for car in front my garage municipales police has came but has not stopped. for 2 hours like i have video recorded. the man that responded to my signalation said that they had other tasks and apologize with me. it sounds very hard.
i have more yet. and in more detailed form.  The things are very many. List are at https://aaastrangedevelopments.blogspot.it

11)  lawsuit for alleged stalking in date 27/12/2017 with around 70 video files describing a strange situation around me, it was closed by judge in 15 January 2018 and closed request was sent to me by Carabinieri.
it is asked archiviation by prosecutor  in date 15/1/2018 
I had no way to present opposition to that request. I had many problems to discuss that with my lawyer.
unbealively descriptions and over 60 videos had no meaning for judge.


12) other strange behaviour signaled to Carabineri in November 2017 at park of my city.
for me a form of menace. I have all the info, if you want I can send them.  


14)  lawsuit for episode of almost aggression and damages on the road in my city.  Facts were happened in 7 december 2018.  The security is very little for me. my trips on the roads are very difficult and dangerous. I had also difficulties to develop lawsuit to police. As is possible see in 
  

Carabinieri does’t receive my lawsuit at 18.50 in Wednesday and other Carabinieri and Police were of little help that evening.  I carry my lawsuit to Crabinieri in  the evening 7 march 2019 as it was to me told. Luckily I had time to do the things.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………..




ABOUT LAWSUIT OF 24 OCTOBER 2013_______________




In particular i indicate this lawsuit where i think things have gone bad very much and from that all has happened.
in it I think perhaps it is possible find false testimony. false in public act. Abuse  law misconduct. and denied justice.   Still I think facts and details are so many it is possible to have a better description reading my site. The story is very simple but how it is developing step by step  is better understood reading my site.  
the facts have happened so:
I think facts so serious are sufficient to strip away the law entirely. 




2)  my lawsuit for alleged stalking at home was made on 10/24/2013,
 it was request to be dismissed in June 2014. the opposition, which was presented in a right times  has not brought to some result  for 2 and a half years. only for my insistence was fixed by judge an hearing in chambers on 2/12/2016 that ended with the judge (GIP)  that send the case to judge of peace on small charges of disturbance of rest of the people.

I think problems with this lawsuit are
1   Investigations from judictiary police have been very poor.  People listened  had little to say and people really important have been not listened.  Notices without sense have had much space in investigation and are reported also by police in their conclusions.
2   Witness important have changed a bit their testimony.
3   Audio and video surely have been little heard and seen.
4  Other aspects of problems have been not investigates. For example woman that helped my old father perhaps was menaced.
5   Lawyers have done very little. In my opinion have done nothing and perhaps problems.
All is on my site

in details  after judge rejected charge of stalking and send people to another judge for charge od disturb of rest of people I put appeal to supreme court. I did everything by myself. my lawyer advised against making the appeal on supreme court preferring a new charge of stalking.
in my site

 i list all strange behavious of lawyer.
lawyer does not knew if results of investigations of police was possible to publish. i wanted to publish  because all the situations were going strange. At the end judge (gip) schedule court hearing to discuss my opposition against archiviation of the judge in 2/12/2016.    in date 30/11/2016 I meet with my lawyer and in my registrations show has get the pages of results of investigations little days before.  and hearing in chamber lasted around 5 minutes. in the time i asked to this lawyer to do things. i have got nothing. literally.
one witness i listed i thought was menaced. i speak with this and another lwayer. nothing has happened.
-   9 january 2017 I appeal to supreme court; in it i signal that the investigators have not heard important witnersses when they were present  in my home during the period under consideration. While police had listened people who weren't informed of the essential facts in a comprehensive manner. In fact the apartment where i lived and under consideration by the complaint was the only occupied when the facts took place. in the period between October 2012 and December 2013 only i and my neighbor were present in that home.  And that was the time when audio and video recordings were also provided. The other witnesses were not there and were not informed about disturbs.  Also I noted that after 2 and a half years some important witness may not be easily found among those reported.
The appeal was filed by me on 1/9/2017 when the lawsuit was presented 10/24/2013. 

Here are the results of investigations of judictiary police

something wrong in staements of people


10 )  in date 18 october 2017 i presented lawsuit for re open investigation of judictiary police because i listed a lot of facts that in my opinion have confused the judge and did him take a wrong decision. it is possible to read on the site.
The lawsuit was closed.

a) i list the worker at my home that seems to say in investigations something different respect what he date sign and write in 3 papers. he says that "si trattenne in quella casa per un mese ma non si recò lì in modo assiduo. nell'arco del mese mi sarò recato lì per 5-6 volte. i by advice of a lawyer asked to this person to come in my home e write and date and sign what he heard.
of this i have written papers. 
Here pages written and signed of witness.


b)  i list people live around me. those did not knowledge about facts are happening in my home but they say something that give a bad appearance about myself. and are listed in conclusions from judictiary police.
one person say R was angry and list one epidode of bad behavior with the parking  of a car. another person say the same thing.
i list another episode where a son of one of these people put a car in bad position. i call urban police. but they come but not stopping. they go on because they received other signalation urgent and not come back in next times. i record this and signal to urban police. and signal in lawsuit. ( i think is a serious fact that one police after calling not stop and not return after finished other work...)
c)  i list other person that say he purchase the home and did works of nsonorization. and put a layer of polystirene among walls.
instead the worker say he did the works under and above the home and a wall in home of neighbour but to pay was only mister R.
d)  one of people investigated by judictiary police said i had with she bad feelings. i hosted one of family for 2 months aand this one took official residence in my home without tell nothing. i ask them to go away.
e)  other persons confirm noise but not say how much they were.
f)  i list  the judictiary police not found 2 witnesses present in home in last period of disturbs. i give name and cell number in lawsuit. and more informations in next opposition, but witnesses were not found.  I met with regularity with one of them. And in lawsuit present 3 videos where I am with this person. In September then November 2015 and august 2017.
i had many audio and video records but they were not heard.
g)  judictiary police in their conclusions say:
-  people say R was a person that asked in hard way his rights.
-  person investigated say R had bad feelings with them.
-  it is not possible say if noise was over normal. and more it is not possible distinguish noise from outside from noise within home.
-   still judictiary police say...from statements of person under investigation seems lack the will to give disturb to others.
and other strange facts. i asked to prosecutor to reopen their investigations and formulate more right allegations



Audio e video of lawsuits are available on line for example. Audio end video of lawsuit of 24 october 2013 are here. On onedrive. 

   6.1.14 audio no video ok  https://1drv.ms/f/s!AgRtZMsp6whyghUk1pPqtNmHclIz
   18.3.14  audio e video ok  https://1drv.ms/f/s!AgRtZMsp6whygm-oRNEBUTwB5oC2
   18.11.13 audio e video ok  https://1drv.ms/f/s!AgRtZMsp6whygmtOlJG0l-AFJB3W
   19.11.13 audio e video ok  https://1drv.ms/f/s!AgRtZMsp6whyghDUghBSkNYRQsq6
   20.11.13 audio e video ok  https://1drv.ms/f/s!AgRtZMsp6whyghHeZc_wLhvTaf9s
   21.11.13 audio e video ok  https://1drv.ms/f/s!AgRtZMsp6whyghLVmlelZ2iHNeAe
   files audio  dei mesi di 2012 e 2013 
   files audio del mese di ottobre 2013



of  more many files loaded on a site of file sharing were lost in early 2014. a site of file sharing that keep files without time limit changed  its policy at a certain time. Or it so seems.  Were lost over 450 files of that time.  Files were recorded and upload to internet on daily basis.
Here my conversation with    rapishare.com
ultima conversazione con rapidshare
I files deleted



Lawsuit in date 17 september 2018 I  have presented lawsuit about behavior of lawyer and judge. I asked if in their behaviours there is something wrong for justice.  Judege had keep quiet my opposition for 2,5 years. Then I noted behaviour of lawyer.
Here are 2 records of talks with lawyer. 22 and 30 september 2016. few days before court hearing of 2 december 2016.

https://1drv.ms/f/s!AgRtZMsp6whyizsldfincqprhths transcriptions are next in this document. 
other email between me and lawyer are here.
the things strange are so many is difficult list all.

Lawyer took results of investigation few days before court hearing. And many problems to took those results. E mail were not received and other things.
Lawyer diminished importance of things. And I in audio record asked to be speak at court. Nothing was done and hearing last only 5 minutes.

Woman that worked in my home to help my old father never was listened or seeked.  I continuosly indicate people in my home and none was found. Still today she work a litte distance form my home.

Supreme court rejected my appeal with ordinanza  n. 46323 del 12 october 2018
Here is the document

to me all this seems very strange because I know how the things are happened.  

.…………………………………………………………………………………………………..

IV. Exhaustion of domestic remedies
1- Steps taken by or on behalf of the alleged victim(s) to exhaust domestic remedies– please provide details on the procedures which have been pursued, including recourse to the courts and other public authorities as well as national human rights institutions[1][1], the claims made, at which times, and what the outcome was:


… compliant number 8884/2013 to tribunale di rimini (date 10/2013) for stalking at home   judge denied charge of stalking and change in disturb of rest of people. In date 2/12/2016. presented opposition at Supreme court of Cassazione in date 1/1/2017.
Compliant number 9822 in date 28/11/2013 a pharmacy inn the night was closed and not respond to doorbell    result nothing
Complint number 838/2013 in date 28/11/2013 for many problems happened ofter death of my father in date 30 june 2013    result   archivied
Compliant number 15464 in date 26/9/2015 for stalking at home    result   open
 Compliant number 21099 in date 10/12/2015 for stalking on the roads   result  open………
compliant 5860/15  in date 16/7/2015  for /embezzlement/ appropriazione indebita  result  archivied
compliant  to carabinieri  8/5/2016  for  fraud o anything possibleof mechanic tecnician.  Asked closed lawsuit. And presented opposition. Closed.
.
.

2- If domestic remedies have not been exhausted on grounds that their application would be ineffective or unreasonably prolonged, please explain the reasons in detail:
Poor work in every sector.



I have other lawsuit open. Es lawsuit for other stalking at home in date September 2015.  requested to close and I did opposition. Nothing has still happened.
Lawsuit for stalking on the roads in October 2015 still open. Nothing I  have known.
Lawsuit in july 2017 for other stalking on the roads in which I fear for my security is without result.
Other problems minor I have had in 2014 e 2015. at least tree. I have put them in a lawsuit form because they were very strange. All closed.
I have asked to prosecutor if work of lawyer and judge was all right. I am still waiting.

I suffered strange episodes in may cases. A few I have put in lawsuit. And strange fact continue in life as is possible to see in my site.

A few were similar to episodes of stalking at park in November 2017 and aggression on the roads in December 2018.
Nothing I have got.
I think it is sufficient to have a understanding of events.
I don’t know why. Nothing has happened for all the things. Many facts are evident and nothing has happened. And continue to happen. Of more there is diposition to close lawsuits.  I think.







…………………………

V. Submission of communication to other human rights bodies
1- Have you already submitted the same matter to a special procedure, a treaty body or other United Nations or similar regional complaint procedures in the field of human rights?
……………
2- If so, detail which procedure has been, or is being pursued, which claims have been made, at which times, and the current status of the complaint before this body:
…………………………

VI. Request for confidentiality
In case the communication complies with the admissibility criteria set forth in Council resolution 5/1, kindly note that it will be transmitted to the State concerned so as to obtain the views of the latter on the allegations of violations.
Please state whether you would like your identity or any specific information contained in the complaint to be kept confidential.
Request for confidentiality (Please tick as appropriate):     Yes x              No
Please indicate which information you would like to be kept confidential
My name and names of lawyers.

Date: 29/10/2017………                                           Signature: xxxxxx………………….
N.B. The blanks under the various sections of this form indicate where your responses are required. You should take as much space as you need to set out your responses. Your complaint should not exceed eights pages.
VII. Checklist of supporting documents

Please provide copies (not original) of supporting documents (kindly note that these documents will not be returned) in one of the six UN official languages.
- Decisions of domestic courts and authorities on the claim made (a copy of the relevant national legislation is also helpful):
- Complaints sent to any other procedure mentioned in section V (and any decisions taken under that procedure):
- Any other evidence or supporting documents deemed necessary:

Facts and documents are very many. List is at  https://aaastrangedevelopments.blogspot.it

I provide transcription of talks with lawyer in date 22 e 30 september 2016. audio is here https://1drv.ms/f/s!AgRtZMsp6whyizsldfincqprhths


allegato 5 trascrizioni complete delle conversazioni

il 22 novembre 2016  colloquio con avvocato.  riassumo: la trascrizione è elencata in copia 4
mi dice che non ha preso il fascicolo. io dico che gli ho mandato una pec il 23 settembre. e l'udienza è tra 10 giorni. vuole essere nominato come avvocato di fiducia. e mi chiede di mandare l'email per prendere gli atti. reitera la richiesta di essere nominato. non risulta che sono io il tuo avvocato.  non è importante la mail o la pec. dice che ha bisogno di un pezzo di carta dove tu mi deleghi a rappresentarti. perchè avendo fatto tutto per conto tuo non risulta che io sono il tuo avvocato.  nel fascicolo io non ci sono. hai presentato la denuncia e l'opposizione da solo. ma io sono venuto da lei per parlare delle cose. io la mando stasera la pec per autorizzare a prendere gli atti.
38.30  mi dice che l'autorizzazione a prendere gli atti va bene sia con la pec sia con la email. dice che non ha ricevuto la email.  la mia pec è stata inviata e anche accettata dal server di posta. l'avvocato dice che non l'ha ricevuta.
dice lei non me l'ha data la pec. io l'ho mandata alla sua email non pec.
al min 42.50 dice che l'udienza è il 2 dicembre e non mi devo importare se gli atti lli studia in un giorno.  chiedo che cosa discutiamo durante l'opposizione? dobbiamo convincere il GIP a rinviare gli atti al PM perchè il Pm completi le indagini. cosa dobbiamo fare allora noi abbiamo diversi punti da sviluppare ( i testimini la badante i file audio video). 
dice delle cose che non sono state adeguatamente valutate.
54.49 dice io la difesa la imbastisco. macche difesa è l'accusa dico.  troverà qualcosa da dire.
55.46 dico nella opposizione cosa discutiamo? dice io peroro la tua opposizione dove tu dici vi prego di non archiviare perchè ci sono anche questi ulteriori elementi di prova che ti produco. discutiamo l'opposizione non è il processo. . diciamo che non deve essere archiviata il procedimento ma proseguito l'istruttoria e rinviatoa processo. possiamo fare riferimento anche agli elementi presentati nella denuncia.
57.44 chiedo se posso intervenire durante l'udienza in camera di consiglio. dice che non lo sa. dice sei li eventualemte provaci.
57.55 elenco ancora i punti da sviluppare: i testimoni, una testimonianza scritta. parliamo dello scritto del testimone. non sa bene di cosa si tratta al 22 novembre 2016.
1.01.10 come andiamo avanti. dice prima del 2 dicembre possiamo solo studiarla. dico ancora io gli ho mandato gli elementi.
1.01.56 lei gli audio li ha ascoltati o ne? ma lei non me li ha mai chiesti neanche. mi chiede ancora di fare la nomina. io gli dico gli rimando la email. mi chiede anche il numero del procedimento. dico l'ho messo sicuramente. poi alla fine mi dice forse ho cancellato la tua email. che polemica è questa?
dice ancora forse mi hai mandato la mail in settembre ma allora non era fissata la data dell'udienza e lui non poteva andare a prendere gli atti. io dico no io sono andatoa prendere gli atti subito dopo la richiesta di archiviazione. dice che quando il fascicolo ritorna davanti al GIP io non posso andarea prenderlo più.
1.04.51 dico visto come è andata sicuramente la archiviano. prepari il ricorso in cassazione. non mi farà perdere il tempo dopo. dice ci saranno i classici 30 giorni.
1.05.50  dico in 2 anni non ha fatto niente per quello di soldi ne do pochi.



30 novembre 2016 incontro avvocato due giorni prima udienza. sembra che l'avvocato non mi sostenga a svii verso cose importanti. e mi dia contro anche sulle cose fondamentali. l'avvocato al 30 novembre 2016 ancora non ha chiaro i fatti. o almeno così sembra e svia sempre su una strada meno grave di quello che è.
min  7.40 mi legge le 3 cose che ha scritto. dice che tutti quelli sentiti hanno detto che da li provenivano i rumori.  ma le cose non erano regolari. un testimone ha detto che ha sentito per tre volte i rumori e ha avuto la disponibilità per un mese della casa.  dice che la sua dichiarazione non è contraddittoria. dico di si. allora dice quello lo posso precisare. dico ancora ha fatto la richiesta del rapportino ai carabinieri. dice ho fatto la richiesta ma non mi hanno mandato niente.
12.30 poi parla delle cose dette da un testimone che non dice niente di importante.
13.30  dico non parli di questo che non è importante. dice io non ho un cazzo da dire. dico l'artigiano è venuto e ha detto che ha sentito i rumori a maggio 2011. poi in autunno c'è stato il rapportino dei carabinieri che dicono che non hanno trovato. poi dal 2012 ho altri files. poi ho la badante Magda che stava in casa con noi. poi ho enrico un altro aiutante dl babbo.  poi ho nacora dei files. anche video.
13.10 l'avvocato insiste sulla testimonianza dell'artigiano che dice ha sentito dei rumori quando venne a fare il preventivo ma in quella occasione non erano ancora finiti i lavori nell'altro appartamento. ma la insonorizzazione è stata fatta nel 20108 e nel 2009. io parlo di disturbi che partono molto dopo. io ho anche le fatture. dico quelle cose non servono. secondo me  l'avvocato parla di cose senza senso. mentre tralascia le cose importanti. 
18.33 ancora dice che l'artigiano mi ha chiesto la casa ionvece ero io che lo invitavo a venire per fare da testimone. lui legge. io dico no. non è così.
19.12 l'avvocato continua dire che domattina è una cosa che dura 5 minuti.  5 minuti mi ripete.  dice che lui deve uisare le 4 cose che ha in croce.
19.56 dico veramente dura 5 minuti quella roba lì? quando deciderà il giudice? forse il giorno dopo se non decide al momento dice.  e dice ancora che il punto non sono che non ci sono i testimoni ma che i rumori non siano volontari.
21.22 l'avvocato dice che la moticazione del PM per archiviare è che non ci sono sufficienti elementi che fosse volontario il disturbo.
24.03 dice che un famiglia che confermava i rumori sono entrati nell'appartamento nel dicembre 2013
26.59 dice che i carabineri hanno detto che il quadro probatorio sarebbe insufficiente in caso di rinvio a giudizio.  io ribadisco all'avvocato che ho la testimonianza dell'artigiano la badante che stava in casa con noi. poi anche l'ltro aiutante del genitore. che erano indicati in opposizione. nei video si sentono i rumori e io che dico alla badfante chi sono quelli che fanno questi rumori? sono loro? lei dice si. dica queste cose al gip. poi in un altro audio si sentono dei colpi e io che chiedo alla badante senti qualcosa. no dice lei.
dico ho audio e video selezionati per la denuncia che vanno da ottobre 2012 fino a novembre 2013. e l'avvocato
32.23 continua a dire del fatto che avendo insonorizzato la casa quella è la rpva che i disturbi c'erano. dico no perchè erano fatti nel 2009. mantre le altre cose importanti non sono considerate. e poi ci sono i testimoni che non sono stati sentiti.
34.57 dico punti su questo: il testimone artigiano incoerente o peggio. contesti quella testimonianza lì.
37.10 dico le cose le dico io. ma lui dice tu non puoi parlare domani. forse potrai dire scusi giudice...dico all'avvocato dire al giudice il mio cliente contesta all'artigiano perchè quello mdetto è imprecisa.
45.32   ancora puntualizzo i punti salienti.  la testimonianza del artigiano che è almeno imprecisa rispetto quella che è. poi il rapportino dei cc che ho chiamati. durante questo periodo è morto anche il babbo.
47.28 io posso parlare chiedo ancora? se no lo dica lei quello. i due testimoni la badante ed enrico l'altro aiutante. i testimini importanti sono quelli in casa per questo la badante era minacciata. e tutti e due non erano sentiti. poi negli audio si sente la badante che dice sono loro e poi in una altra occasione nega. poi ho i files audio e video.
54.49 ancora insiste sull'artigiano che mi da parzialmente ragione. no dico è molto peggio.
così di seguito ripetendo la solita litania di imprecisioni. e mi contesta continuamente le cose che dico. alla fine dell'incontro l'avvocato non ha chiaro ancora la situazione.
1.09.04  ancora dico se  serve chieda a me.  dico io fiducioso. mi dice io posso partecipare.
invece non chiamato




VIII. Where to send your communications?
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
Human Rights Council Branch-Complaint Procedure Unit
OHCHR- Palais Wilson
United Nations Office at Geneva
CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland
Fax: (+41 22) 917 90 11
E-mail: CP@ohchr.org



[2][1] National human rights institutions, established and operating under the Principles Relating to the Status of National Institutions (the Paris Principles), in particular in regard to quasi-judicial competence, may serve as effective means of addressing individual human rights violations

Nessun commento:

Posta un commento