i sent other complaint requests litte i have hot
i sent in other 3 times at least
this complaint sayd this as a summary of things
· · · · continuing violations
Yahoo/Inviati
xxxx <xxxx@yahoo.it>
A:CP@ohchr.org
17 mar alle ore 00:50
i send this email to complaint continuity in
violations on me.
starting with lawsuit of 24 october 2013 that had no
result violations continue.i speak about that problem but many other problems i
listed.
maybe depending on violations on me in that
moment law has vanished for me.
i cann't to think live without law. after i live
without other things.
of mere things have came at a serious point today when
supreme court has rejected my appeal. that case was a
tipical case of multiple violations in my opinion from
that everything has started.
it seems law search ways to strip law. and this is
very last thing to use to strip the rights.
i have listed 14 cases of violations. at least tree
are non listed. and many many other violations on a daily basis are going.
and i write a this body from much time. things have
non changed have get worse in time. the most success would to be strip law. in
days when the things are always more clear.
Human Rights Council
Complaint Procedure Form
You are kindly requested to submit your complaint in writing in one of the six
official UN languages (Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian and Spanish)
and to use these languages in any future correspondence;
-
Anonymous complaints are not
admissible;
-
It is recommended that your complaint does not exceed eight pages, excluding
enclosures.
-
You are kindly requested not to use abusive or insulting language.
I. Information
concerning the author (s) of the communication or the alleged victim (s) if
other than the author
Individual
Group of
individuals
NGO
Other
Last name: xxxx………
First name(s): xxxx………….
Nationality:
…italiana……
Address for correspondence
on this complaint: via xxxxxx italy………..
Tel and fax: (please
indicate country and area code) xxxxx……….
E-mail: xxxxx@yahoo.it……….
facebook site
with over
Submitting the complaint:
On the author’s own
behalf:
On behalf of other
persons: (Please specify: ………………..)
II. Information
on the State concerned
Name of the State
concerned and, as applicable, name of public authorities responsible for the
alleged violation(s): Italia, …………..
III. Facts of
the complaint and nature of the alleged violation(s)
The
complaint procedure addresses consistent patterns of gross and reliably
attested violations of all human rights and all fundamental freedoms occurring
in any part of the world and under any circumstances.
Please
detail, in chronological order, the facts and circumstances of the alleged
violations including dates, places and alleged perpetrators and how you
consider that the facts and circumstances described violate your rights or that
of the concerned person(s).
I
have presented at least 10 lawsuits to prosecutor. I list them next and discuss
them in brief after the list. All lawsuits have problems. I discuss in detail
the lawsuit of 24 october 2013 one of most importance and without result. And
that I think has caused all the problems.
…
List
of lawsuits presented
in chronologically order i prersent all the lawsuits i
have presented in the time. they are detailed well in my site. the summary is
1 a lawsuit against me in june 2012 made for
embezzlement duration 24 months and 2 search at home. now
closed.
2 lawsuit for alleged stalking made on
24/10//2013 number 8884/2013 and 11/28/2013 integration I submitted:
3 on 11/28/2013 number 9822/2013 complaint
for bad service of a pharmacy. currently open proceedings but to no results.
4 always on 11/28/2013 number 838/2013 for bad
behaviors during a request for autopsy. an important witness was not heard and
lawsuit was closed.
5 on 7/16/2015 complaint for misappropriation of
a sum. the terms had expired but the fact could with aggravation .
closed. lawsuit can continue on request of damages.
6 on 26/9/2016 number 15464/15 for
other alleged stalking at home. open but on stand by for now. It has been
told i is closed now. Not have document from court yet.
7 on 12/10/2015 number 21099/15 more and
different type of stalking on roads. open this but on stand by
8 complaint for fraud by a mechanic on May 8,
2016. it was requested to closed. I did opposition an then opposition at
supreme court. Supreme court reject my legal demand in march 2018.
9 lawsuit 6/7/2017 protocollo
verbale: RNCS12 2017 VD 902136 stalking on the roads. Presented at
Carabinieri of my city. Other that of 12/10/2015 for more hard
stalking. Actually open.
10
lawsuit 18/10/2017 to reopen investigations on the old
lawsuit of october 2013 n. 8884. closed.
11
lawsuit for alleged stalking in date 27/12/2017 . from a neighbour.
judge has asked to close this lawsuit.
My
effords to present another opposition with other arguments and materials was
delayed by lawyer of the time. I have listed my communications with this
lawyer. Lawsuit is so closed officially.
12
one minor signalation in November 2017 to police for strange behaviours
near city park. To me it seemed another stalking done by several people.
13 in
17 september 2018 I presented lawsuit a prosecutor to consider if in behaviour
of my lawyer and of Judge GIP there have been something relevant for justice.
And asked to reopen investigation on that judiciary case. And add other
details in form of records and transcitions.
14
In 7 march 2019 I present another reporting /compliant to police of my city for
bad behaviour of one person on the roads. It was almost an aggression and with
a damage to my car in my opionion.
To present
this compliant I have had many problems as I list in my site.
Today I have
many problems to do everything.
In the site
are listing only a little part of all the problems.
It
seems to me justice refuse to take in consideration the facts I present. And
continuely close lawsuits.
I
have experienced many other strange facts and only in last few months. It is
possible to see in my site
…..…………………………………………………………………………………………...
…………………………………………………………………………………………………..
MORE DETAILS ABOUT
LAWSUITS_______________________________
2) my lawsuit for
stalking at home was made on 10/24/2013,
it was request to
be dismissed in June 2014. the opposition, which was presented in a right
times has not brought to some result for 2 and a half years. only
for my insistence was fixed by judge an hearing in chambers on 2/12/2016 that
ended with the judge (GIP) that send the case to judge of peace on small
charges of disturbance of rest of the people.
_____________________________
6) over this case
of justice i have presented another lawsuit foc a case very similar (stalking at
home) e presented in date on 26/sett/2015 number 15464/15 . Accompanied
by sound files to confirm everything. Still open but without results. files
audio last for over 1 year. i have also video about it.
7) I again presented a
lawsuit for stalking on the roads on 12/10/2015 number 21099/15. in this i
signal the incorrect behavior of different subjects on the streets. A summary
of things that happen lately are viewable on the site
In addition to these
videos i have presented in the lawsuit more videos, from March 2014 they
are now on youtube in private mode.
Other later youtube
site with videos, with hundreds videos
Here other youtube
site
Today I have add video
from my facebook account. At this address
obvously bad behavior
is continuing and worsens. And is becoming very serious.
over than on the
streets i have encounter strange behavior in many other social situations. Some
of these are documented in the site.
This lawsuit seems
revealing of misconduct towards me on several fronts so much that i have rised
a considerable anxiety in me. Of more the delay with which these problems are
treated by Justice push me to use this resource to try to find a solution.
Just i list some
elusive behavior of various tecnicians I consulted in time and I kept
documentation.
For example some
tecnician i consulted to do improvements at home. Starting from 2010
I almost got
nothing and several technicians i have consulted. A mechanic that I sued for
fraud. A pc owner. present also a list of past problems and
misconducts. And also of course the elusive behavior of justice
professionals. Some details you can see here
and others in the site.
9) 6 luglio 2017
presented other
lawsuit at local Carabinieri station for other type of stalking on the roads.
protocollo verbale: RNCS12 2017 VD 902136.
in the lawsuit i
presented documentation video that lasts 2 and half months. from around 15
april 2017 to 30 june 2017. i signal that i fear for my safety.
last videos are in youtube sites too.
also another youtube channel
And in that last
twitter site
____ like a
confirm in 31 july 2017 i clash with another car along the street. clash with another auto
in back move. this car move back from other park on other side of street and
hit me meanwhile i go on other side of street. i have a chart that confirm it
written for insurance purpose.
to me seems very too
much. so present this demand to this body of UN
I have these and others
compliants. I don’t report all these. They are possible to read on the site
and bad works in many
sectors.
_____ with car very many problems.
and bad work. to replace the clutch of car i waited 1 (one) month. and work was
very bad. i have testify of other tecnician. bad work that is not possible to
do. compliant to carabinieri 8/5/2016
and then an incredible
waste of time. List in site is much incomplete. for every little thing. post
service does not bring mail to my home when it had alwasys done that in past. .
the motive was because on my postbox there is not my name and is told on site
of mail service that if there is not the name the postman is autorized to send
back the mail.
then for car in front my
garage municipales police has came but has not stopped. for 2 hours like i have
video recorded. the man that responded to my signalation said that they had
other tasks and apologize with me. it sounds very hard.
11)
lawsuit for alleged stalking in date 27/12/2017 with around
70 video files describing a strange situation around me, it was closed by judge
in 15 January 2018 and closed request was sent to me by Carabinieri.
it is asked archiviation
by prosecutor in date 15/1/2018
I had no way to present
opposition to that request. I had many problems to discuss that with my lawyer.
unbealively descriptions
and over 60 videos had no meaning for judge.
12)
other strange behaviour signaled to Carabineri in
November 2017 at park of my city.
for me a form of menace. I
have all the info, if you want I can send them.
14)
lawsuit for episode of almost aggression and damages on the road in my city.
Facts were happened in 7 december 2018. The security is very little
for me. my trips on the roads are very difficult and dangerous. I had also
difficulties to develop lawsuit to police. As is possible see in
Carabinieri does’t receive
my lawsuit at 18.50 in
Wednesday
and other Carabinieri and Police were of little help that evening. I
carry my lawsuit to Crabinieri in the evening 7 march 2019 as it was to
me told. Luckily I had time to do the things.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………..
ABOUT
LAWSUIT OF 24 OCTOBER 2013_______________
In
particular i indicate this lawsuit where i think things have gone bad very much
and from that all has happened.
in it I
think perhaps it is possible find false testimony. false in public act.
Abuse law misconduct. and denied justice. Still
I think facts and details are so many it is possible to have a better
description reading my site. The story is very simple but how it is developing
step by step is better understood reading my site.
the facts have happened
so:
I think facts so serious
are sufficient to strip away the law entirely.
2) my lawsuit for
alleged stalking at home was made on 10/24/2013,
it was request to
be dismissed in June 2014. the opposition, which was presented in a right
times has not brought to some result for 2 and a half years. only
for my insistence was fixed by judge an hearing in chambers on 2/12/2016 that
ended with the judge (GIP) that send the case to judge of peace on small
charges of disturbance of rest of the people.
I think problems with
this lawsuit are
1
Investigations from judictiary police have been very poor. People
listened had little to say and people really important have been not
listened. Notices without sense have had much space in investigation and
are reported also by police in their conclusions.
2 Witness
important have changed a bit their testimony.
3 Audio and
video surely have been little heard and seen.
4 Other aspects
of problems have been not investigates. For example woman that helped my old
father perhaps was menaced.
5 Lawyers
have done very little. In my opinion have done nothing and perhaps problems.
All is on my site
in details after
judge rejected charge of stalking and send people to another judge for charge
od disturb of rest of people I put appeal to supreme court. I did everything by
myself. my lawyer advised against making the appeal on supreme court preferring
a new charge of stalking.
in my site
i list all
strange behavious of lawyer.
lawyer does not knew if
results of investigations of police was possible to publish. i wanted to
publish because all the situations were going strange. At the end judge
(gip) schedule court hearing to discuss my opposition against archiviation of
the judge in 2/12/2016. in date 30/11/2016 I meet with my
lawyer and in my registrations show has get the pages of results of
investigations little days before. and hearing in chamber lasted around 5
minutes. in the time i asked to this lawyer to do things. i have got nothing.
literally.
one witness i listed i
thought was menaced. i speak with this and another lwayer. nothing has
happened.
- 9 january
2017 I appeal to supreme court; in it i signal that the investigators have not
heard important witnersses when they were present in my home during the
period under consideration. While police had listened people who weren't
informed of the essential facts in a comprehensive manner. In fact the
apartment where i lived and under consideration by the complaint was the only
occupied when the facts took place. in the period between October 2012 and
December 2013 only i and my neighbor were present in that home. And that
was the time when audio and video recordings were also provided. The other
witnesses were not there and were not informed about disturbs. Also I
noted that after 2 and a half years some important witness may not be easily
found among those reported.
The
appeal was filed by me on 1/9/2017 when the lawsuit was presented
10/24/2013.
Here are the
results of investigations of judictiary police
something wrong in
staements of people
10 ) in date 18
october 2017
i presented lawsuit for re open investigation of judictiary police because i
listed a lot of facts that in my opinion have confused the judge and did him
take a wrong decision. it is possible to read on the site.
The lawsuit was closed.
a) i list the worker at
my home that seems to say in investigations something different respect what he
date sign and write in 3 papers. he says that "si trattenne in quella casa
per un mese ma non si recò lì in modo assiduo. nell'arco del mese mi sarò recato lì per 5-6 volte. i
by advice of a lawyer asked to this person to come in my home e write and date
and sign what he heard.
of this i have written
papers.
Here pages written and
signed of witness.
b) i list people
live around me. those did not knowledge about facts are happening in my home
but they say something that give a bad appearance about myself. and are listed
in conclusions from judictiary police.
one person say R was
angry and list one epidode of bad behavior with the parking of a car.
another person say the same thing.
i list another episode
where a son of one of these people put a car in bad position. i call urban
police. but they come but not stopping. they go on because they received other
signalation urgent and not come back in next times. i record this and signal to
urban police. and signal in lawsuit. ( i think is a serious fact that one
police after calling not stop and not return after finished other work...)
c) i list other
person that say he purchase the home and did works of nsonorization. and put a
layer of polystirene among walls.
instead the worker say
he did the works under and above the home and a wall in home of neighbour but
to pay was only mister R.
d) one of people
investigated by judictiary police said i had with she bad feelings. i hosted
one of family for 2 months aand this one took official residence in my home
without tell nothing. i ask them to go away.
e) other persons
confirm noise but not say how much they were.
f) i list
the judictiary police not found 2 witnesses present in home in last period of
disturbs. i give name and cell number in lawsuit. and more informations in next
opposition, but witnesses were not found. I met with regularity with one
of them. And in lawsuit present 3 videos where I am with this person. In
September then November 2015 and august 2017.
i had many audio and
video records but they were not heard.
g) judictiary
police in their conclusions say:
- people say R
was a person that asked in hard way his rights.
- person
investigated say R had bad feelings with them.
- it is not
possible say if noise was over normal. and more it is not possible distinguish
noise from outside from noise within home.
- still
judictiary police say...from statements of person under investigation seems
lack the will to give disturb to others.
and other strange
facts. i asked to prosecutor to reopen their investigations and formulate more
right allegations
Audio
e video of lawsuits are available on line for example. Audio end video of
lawsuit of 24 october 2013 are here. On onedrive.
files audio dei mesi di 2012
e 2013
files audio del mese
di ottobre 2013
of
more many files loaded on a site of file sharing were lost in early 2014. a site of file
sharing that keep files without time limit changed its policy at a
certain time. Or it so seems. Were lost over 450 files of that time.
Files were recorded and upload to internet on daily basis.
Here
my conversation with rapishare.com
ultima conversazione con
rapidshare
I
files deleted
Lawsuit
in date 17 september 2018 I have presented lawsuit about behavior of
lawyer and judge. I asked if in their behaviours there is something wrong for
justice. Judege had keep quiet my opposition for 2,5 years. Then I noted
behaviour of lawyer.
Here
are 2 records of talks with lawyer. 22 and 30 september 2016. few days before
court hearing of 2 december 2016.
other
email between me and lawyer are here.
the things strange are so many is difficult list all.
Lawyer took results of investigation few days before court hearing. And
many problems to took those results. E mail were not received and other things.
Lawyer diminished importance of things. And I in audio record asked to
be speak at court. Nothing was done and hearing last only 5 minutes.
Woman that worked
in my home to help my old father never was listened or seeked. I
continuosly indicate people in my home and none was found. Still today she work
a litte distance form my home.
Supreme court
rejected my appeal with ordinanza n. 46323 del 12 october 2018
Here is the document
to me all this
seems very strange because I know how the things are happened.
.…………………………………………………………………………………………………..
IV. Exhaustion of domestic remedies
1- Steps taken by or
on behalf of the alleged victim(s) to exhaust domestic remedies– please provide
details on the procedures which have been pursued, including recourse to the
courts and other public authorities as well as national human rights
institutions[1][1], the claims made, at which times, and what
the outcome was:
… compliant number
8884/2013 to tribunale di rimini (date 10/2013) for stalking at
home judge denied charge of stalking and change in disturb of rest
of people. In date 2/12/2016. presented opposition at Supreme court of
Cassazione in date 1/1/2017.
Compliant number 9822 in date 28/11/2013 a
pharmacy inn the night was closed and not respond to doorbell
result nothing
Complint number
838/2013 in date 28/11/2013 for many problems happened ofter death of my father
in date 30 june 2013 result archivied
Compliant number 15464 in date 26/9/2015
for stalking at home result open
Compliant number 21099 in date 10/12/2015
for stalking on the roads result open………
compliant
5860/15 in date 16/7/2015 for /embezzlement/ appropriazione
indebita result archivied
compliant to
carabinieri 8/5/2016 for fraud o anything possibleof mechanic
tecnician. Asked closed lawsuit. And presented opposition. Closed.
.
.
2- If domestic
remedies have not been exhausted on grounds that their application would be
ineffective or unreasonably prolonged, please explain the reasons in detail:
Poor work in every
sector.
I have other
lawsuit open. Es lawsuit for other stalking at home in date September
2015. requested to close and I did opposition. Nothing has still
happened.
Lawsuit for
stalking on the roads in October 2015 still open. Nothing I have known.
Lawsuit in july
2017 for other stalking on the roads in which I fear for my security is without
result.
Other problems
minor I have had in 2014 e 2015. at least tree. I have put them in a lawsuit
form because they were very strange. All closed.
I have asked to
prosecutor if work of lawyer and judge was all right. I am still waiting.
I suffered strange episodes in may cases. A few I have put
in lawsuit. And strange fact continue in life as is possible to see in my site.
A few were similar
to episodes of stalking at park in November 2017 and aggression on the roads in
December 2018.
Nothing I have got.
I think it is
sufficient to have a understanding of events.
I don’t know why.
Nothing has happened for all the things. Many facts are evident and nothing has
happened. And continue to happen. Of more there is diposition to close
lawsuits. I think.
…………………………
V. Submission of communication to other human rights bodies
1- Have you already
submitted the same matter to a special procedure, a treaty body or other United
Nations or similar regional complaint procedures in the field of human rights?
……………
2- If so, detail
which procedure has been, or is being pursued, which claims have been made, at
which times, and the current status of the complaint before this body:
…………………………
VI. Request for confidentiality
In case
the communication complies with the admissibility criteria set forth in Council
resolution 5/1, kindly note that it will be transmitted to the State concerned
so as to obtain the views of the latter on the allegations of violations.
Please
state whether you would like your identity or any specific information
contained in the complaint to be kept confidential.
Request
for confidentiality (Please tick as appropriate):
Yes x
No
Please
indicate which information you would like to be kept confidential
My name
and names of lawyers.
Date:
29/10/2017………
Signature: xxxxxx………………….
N.B. The blanks
under the various sections of this form indicate where your responses are
required. You should take as much space as you need to set out your responses.
Your complaint should not exceed eights pages.
VII. Checklist of supporting documents
Please provide
copies (not original) of supporting documents (kindly note that these documents
will not be returned) in one of the six UN official languages.
- Decisions of
domestic courts and authorities on the claim made (a copy of the relevant
national legislation is also helpful):
- Complaints sent
to any other procedure mentioned in section V (and any decisions taken
under that procedure):
- Any other
evidence or supporting documents deemed necessary:
Facts and documents
are very many. List is at https://aaastrangedevelopments.blogspot.it
allegato 5
trascrizioni complete delle conversazioni
il 22
novembre 2016 colloquio con avvocato. riassumo: la trascrizione è
elencata in copia 4
mi dice che non ha preso il fascicolo. io dico che gli ho mandato una
pec il 23 settembre. e l'udienza è tra 10 giorni. vuole essere nominato come
avvocato di fiducia. e mi chiede di mandare l'email per prendere gli atti.
reitera la richiesta di essere nominato. non risulta che sono io il tuo
avvocato. non è importante la mail o la pec. dice che ha bisogno di un
pezzo di carta dove tu mi deleghi a rappresentarti. perchè avendo fatto tutto
per conto tuo non risulta che io sono il tuo avvocato. nel fascicolo io
non ci sono. hai presentato la denuncia e l'opposizione da solo. ma io sono
venuto da lei per parlare delle cose. io la mando stasera la pec per
autorizzare a prendere gli atti.
38.30 mi dice che l'autorizzazione a prendere gli atti va bene sia
con la pec sia con la email. dice che non ha ricevuto la email. la mia
pec è stata inviata e anche accettata dal server di posta. l'avvocato dice che
non l'ha ricevuta.
dice lei non me l'ha data la pec. io l'ho mandata alla sua email non
pec.
al min 42.50 dice che l'udienza è il 2 dicembre e non mi devo importare
se gli atti lli studia in un giorno. chiedo che cosa discutiamo durante
l'opposizione? dobbiamo convincere il GIP a rinviare gli atti al PM perchè il
Pm completi le indagini. cosa dobbiamo fare allora noi abbiamo diversi punti da
sviluppare ( i testimini la badante i file audio video).
dice delle cose che non sono state adeguatamente valutate.
54.49 dice io la difesa la imbastisco. macche difesa è l'accusa
dico. troverà qualcosa da dire.
55.46 dico nella opposizione cosa discutiamo? dice io peroro la tua
opposizione dove tu dici vi prego di non archiviare perchè ci sono anche questi
ulteriori elementi di prova che ti produco. discutiamo l'opposizione non è il
processo. . diciamo che non deve essere archiviata il procedimento ma
proseguito l'istruttoria e rinviatoa processo. possiamo fare riferimento anche
agli elementi presentati nella denuncia.
57.44 chiedo se posso intervenire durante l'udienza in camera di
consiglio. dice che non lo sa. dice sei li eventualemte provaci.
57.55 elenco ancora i punti da sviluppare: i testimoni, una
testimonianza scritta. parliamo dello scritto del testimone. non sa bene di
cosa si tratta al 22 novembre 2016.
1.01.10 come andiamo avanti. dice prima del 2 dicembre possiamo solo
studiarla. dico ancora io gli ho mandato gli elementi.
1.01.56 lei gli audio li ha ascoltati o ne? ma lei non me li ha mai
chiesti neanche. mi chiede ancora di fare la nomina. io gli dico gli rimando la
email. mi chiede anche il numero del procedimento. dico l'ho messo sicuramente.
poi alla fine mi dice forse ho cancellato la tua email. che polemica è questa?
dice ancora forse mi hai mandato la mail in settembre ma allora non era
fissata la data dell'udienza e lui non poteva andare a prendere gli atti. io
dico no io sono andatoa prendere gli atti subito dopo la richiesta di
archiviazione. dice che quando il fascicolo ritorna davanti al GIP io non posso
andarea prenderlo più.
1.04.51 dico visto come è andata sicuramente la archiviano. prepari il
ricorso in cassazione. non mi farà perdere il tempo dopo. dice ci saranno i
classici 30 giorni.
1.05.50 dico in 2 anni non ha fatto niente per quello di soldi ne
do pochi.
30 novembre 2016 incontro avvocato due giorni prima udienza. sembra che
l'avvocato non mi sostenga a svii verso cose importanti. e mi dia contro anche
sulle cose fondamentali. l'avvocato al 30 novembre 2016 ancora non ha chiaro i
fatti. o almeno così sembra e svia sempre su una strada meno grave di quello
che è.
min 7.40 mi
legge le 3 cose che ha scritto. dice che tutti quelli sentiti hanno detto che
da li provenivano i rumori. ma le cose non erano regolari. un testimone
ha detto che ha sentito per tre volte i rumori e ha avuto la disponibilità per
un mese della casa. dice che la sua dichiarazione non è contraddittoria.
dico di si. allora dice quello lo posso precisare. dico ancora ha fatto la
richiesta del rapportino ai carabinieri. dice ho fatto la richiesta ma non mi hanno
mandato niente.
12.30 poi parla delle cose dette da un testimone che non dice niente di
importante.
13.30 dico non parli di questo che non è importante. dice io non
ho un cazzo da dire. dico l'artigiano è venuto e ha detto che ha sentito i
rumori a maggio 2011. poi in autunno c'è stato il rapportino dei carabinieri
che dicono che non hanno trovato. poi dal 2012 ho altri files. poi ho la
badante Magda che stava in casa con noi. poi ho enrico un altro aiutante dl
babbo. poi ho nacora dei files. anche video.
13.10 l'avvocato insiste
sulla testimonianza dell'artigiano che dice ha sentito dei rumori quando venne
a fare il preventivo ma in quella occasione non erano ancora finiti i lavori
nell'altro appartamento. ma la insonorizzazione è stata fatta nel 20108 e nel
2009. io parlo di disturbi che partono molto dopo. io ho anche le fatture. dico
quelle cose non servono. secondo me l'avvocato parla di cose senza senso.
mentre tralascia le cose importanti.
18.33 ancora dice che l'artigiano mi ha chiesto la casa ionvece ero io
che lo invitavo a venire per fare da testimone. lui legge. io dico no. non è
così.
19.12 l'avvocato continua
dire che domattina è una cosa che dura 5 minuti. 5 minuti mi
ripete. dice che lui deve uisare le 4 cose che ha in croce.
19.56 dico veramente dura 5 minuti quella roba lì? quando deciderà il
giudice? forse il giorno dopo se non decide al momento dice. e dice
ancora che il punto non sono che non ci sono i testimoni ma che i rumori non
siano volontari.
21.22 l'avvocato dice che
la moticazione del PM per archiviare è che non ci sono sufficienti elementi che
fosse volontario il disturbo.
24.03 dice che un famiglia che confermava i rumori sono entrati
nell'appartamento nel dicembre 2013
26.59 dice che i carabineri hanno detto che il quadro probatorio sarebbe
insufficiente in caso di rinvio a giudizio. io ribadisco all'avvocato che
ho la testimonianza dell'artigiano la badante che stava in casa con noi. poi
anche l'ltro aiutante del genitore. che erano indicati in opposizione. nei
video si sentono i rumori e io che dico alla badfante chi sono quelli che fanno
questi rumori? sono loro? lei dice si. dica queste cose al gip. poi in un altro
audio si sentono dei colpi e io che chiedo alla badante senti qualcosa. no dice
lei.
dico ho audio e video selezionati per la denuncia che vanno da ottobre
2012 fino a novembre 2013. e l'avvocato
32.23 continua a dire del fatto che avendo insonorizzato la casa quella
è la rpva che i disturbi c'erano. dico no perchè erano fatti nel 2009. mantre
le altre cose importanti non sono considerate. e poi ci sono i testimoni che
non sono stati sentiti.
34.57 dico punti su questo: il testimone artigiano incoerente o peggio.
contesti quella testimonianza lì.
37.10 dico le cose le dico io. ma lui dice tu non puoi parlare domani.
forse potrai dire scusi giudice...dico all'avvocato dire al giudice il mio
cliente contesta all'artigiano perchè quello mdetto è imprecisa.
45.32 ancora puntualizzo i punti salienti. la
testimonianza del artigiano che è almeno imprecisa rispetto quella che è. poi
il rapportino dei cc che ho chiamati. durante questo periodo è morto anche il
babbo.
47.28 io posso parlare chiedo ancora? se no lo dica lei quello. i due
testimoni la badante ed enrico l'altro aiutante. i testimini importanti sono
quelli in casa per questo la badante era minacciata. e tutti e due non erano
sentiti. poi negli audio si sente la badante che dice sono loro e poi in una
altra occasione nega. poi ho i files audio e video.
54.49 ancora insiste sull'artigiano che mi da parzialmente ragione. no
dico è molto peggio.
così di seguito ripetendo la solita litania di imprecisioni. e mi
contesta continuamente le cose che dico. alla fine dell'incontro l'avvocato non
ha chiaro ancora la situazione.
1.09.04 ancora dico se serve chieda a me. dico io
fiducioso. mi dice io posso partecipare.
invece non chiamato
VIII. Where to send your communications?
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
Human Rights Council Branch-Complaint Procedure Unit
OHCHR- Palais Wilson
United Nations Office at Geneva
CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland
Fax: (+41 22) 917 90 11
E-mail: CP@ohchr.org
[2][1]
National human rights institutions, established and operating under the
Principles Relating to the Status of National Institutions (the Paris
Principles), in particular in regard to quasi-judicial competence, may serve as
effective means of addressing individual human rights violations
